Hello HugTech executives,

And also people who seek your products,

And also people who do not yet seek your products but may in the future,

And also people who have sought your products but no longer do so,

And also other assorted people, even those whom are beneath My notice,

Firstly I would like to say that I am in full agreement with Clover's sentiment regarding the inclusion of the Eckin in a line of animal-themed products. A sentient being caged is a foul thing, as abhorrent to Me as the enslaved Xariel of Prugita. Will we also see Xariel dolls sold as 'cute animals?' I request that all proceeds from the Eckin dolls be diverted to GCEPS, retroactively, and that you use your political connections to see to it that Sslenick be released.

On the matter of known spacer dolls, the assertion that future dolls adhere to family friendly designs is laughable and would, obviously, cut heavily into your profit margins by denying a demographic known for spending excessive marks on oddly sexualized novelties. I am you see the (monetary) value of My point.

Finally, I find Myself confused by My inclusion on Flipilaria's list twice, one in My 'Goddess Form,' which would obviously be Me as I am and have always been. As for the lingerie ensemble, I can assure all of you, executives, supplicants, disbelievers and assorted others, that I have never owned such attire and find the idea absurd. If you wish to convince Me of some reason I should, however, I invite you to join Me for tea and a time which is mutually agreeable.

Thank you all for your time,

Slander Erebus, Goddess of Scatterhome, Matron of Alcohol, Drugs, Rockhopper Gelatins, Flagrant Sexuality and Weird Tree Dancing